|
back
to data |
|
|
See
speculations from sea otter experts at
the National Biological Service, James L. Bodkin, Ronald J. Jameson, and
James A. Estes. |
|
A study compared
the community structure of two western Aleutian Islands with and without
sea otters in the early 70s. The islands physically similar and are in
close proximity.
- AMCHITKA
ISLAND. Population surveys reported an estimated 20 to 30 sea otters
per square kilometer of habitat. This has existed for about 20 to 30
years.
- SHEMYA ISLAND.
There have been scattered sightings of sea otters around this island,
but no population had reestablished at the time of the study.
|
|
Figure
1. Size distribution of sea urchin density on Amchitka and Shemya
Islands in Bering Sea. |
|
|
Figure 1 compares
the number of sea urchins present per quarter square meter with the size
of the sea urchins.
- AMCHITKA
ISLAND. Large sea urchins are absent.
- SHEMYA ISLAND.
There is a high number of small sea urchins present. Additionally, larger
sized sea urchins are also found.
(Figure
modified from data presented in Estes and Palmisano,
1974)
|
Figure 2 compares
the sea urchin biomass with the size of the sea urchins. Biomass refers
to the total weight of the sea urchins per quarter square meter samples.
- AMCHITKA
ISLAND. Low biomass of sea urchins.
- SHEMYA ISLAND.
High sea urchin biomass. This makes sense since there are considerably
more larger sized sea urchins.
(Figure
modified from data presented in Estes and Palmisano,
1974) |
|
Figure
2. Sea urchin biomass on Amchitka and Shemya Islands in Bering
Sea. |
|
|
Table
1. Density and abundance of major flora and fauna in water around
Amchitka and Shemya Islands. |
|
AMCHITKA
ISLAND
|
SHEMYA
ISLAND
|
Kelp |
Almost
complete mats present with <1% kelp with evidence of grazing. |
More
than 50% of sampled kelp plots showed signs of grazing. |
Sessile,
filter-feeding invertebrates (e.g. barnacles and mussels) |
- Barnacle
density: 4.9 m^2
-
Mussel density: 3.8 m^2
|
- Barnacle
density: 1215 m^2
-
Mussel density: 722 m^2
|
Mobile,
herbivorous invertebrates (e.g. sea urchins and chitons) |
- Sea
urchin density: 8 m^2
- Chiton
density: 1 m^2
|
- Sea
urchin density: 78 m^2
- Chiton
density: 38 m^2
|
(Table
generated from data presented in Estes
and Palmisano, 1974) |
|
|
Table 1 compares
the amount of kelp and invertebrates in the waters around Amchitka and
Shemya Islands. Notice that Amchitka Island has significantly less sessile
mobile invertebrates, and much more kelp present. The lack of mobile herbivorous
invertebrates allow kelp density to increase.
- Presence
of sea otters is the major difference between these two islands.
- How
do you think sea otters affect the community structure?
|
back
to data |
|
|
This web
site was created by Lynn Tran at the North Carolina State University, Department
of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education on 7/12/03. Faculty advisor
Dr. David Eggleston, NCSU, Department of Marine, Earth, & Atmospheric Sciences.
Last updated
December 29, 2003
.
|